Close

Articles Posted in Mesothelioma Case

Updated:

Ganoe v. Metalclad Insulation Corp: On Defendant’s Attempts at Obtaining Summary Judgment

Our Boston mesothelioma attorneys understand that the companies responsible for producing and installing toxic asbestos often choose to spend their money fighting just claims from people diagnosed with mesothelioma. These corporate defendants will attempt to use the discovery process as a weapon to avoid taking responsibility for their negligence. Ganoe…

Updated:

Mesothelioma Lawsuits for Shipyard Workers

Our Boston mesothelioma lawyers know that our city’s once great maritime industry may be responsible for countless cases of asbestos exposure. According to a recent article in the Louisiana Record, a former shipyard worker has filed a negligence action against multiple companies that allegedly caused his mesothelioma. The plaintiff is…

Updated:

Rost v. Ford Motor Corp. – “Any Exposure” Testimony Tested

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania was recently tasked with determining whether the decision by the state supreme court in Betz v. Pneumo Abex, LLC effectively barred expert testimony relying upon the “any exposure” theory of asbestos-related diseases. In weighing the facts of Rost, R. v. Ford Motor Company, the court…

Updated:

Williams Sr. et al. v. Placid Oil Co. – Fifth Circuit Upholds Dismissal of Asbestos Death Claim

In the case of Williams Sr. et al. v. Placid Oil Co., recently weighed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, an asbestos manufacturer’s bankruptcy effectively derailed the plaintiff’s claim for damages. In a split decision, the appellate court held that because the plaintiff was an “unknown…

Updated:

Union Carbide Corp. v. Nix – Court Reverses Claim for Punitive Damages

In civil matters, there are two primary types of compensation: Compensatory and punitive. Both ultimately go to the plaintiff if he or she wins the case, but they serve very different purposes. Compensatory damages are those awarded to compensate the victim for the direct costs suffered – ie., medical bills,…

Updated:

Merwitz v. Allis-Chalmer et al, Jury Awards $7.25M to Plaintiff in Asbestos Trial

Rejecting all of the remaining defenses, a jury in Pennsylvania awarded $7.25 million to the survivors of a man who died after being diagnosed with mesothelioma due to asbestos exposure. The victim, now deceased, was diagnosed with the aggressive cancer in January 2010, several decades after his exposure during the…

Updated:

Aggressive Mesothelioma Surgery Remains Controversial

As one of the most aggressive forms of cancer, patients of mesothelioma are often willing to try anything, even new or experimental treatments. One aggressive form of mesothelioma treatment has been the subject of debate as medical experts continue to debate the effectiveness of a clinical trial. According to some…

Updated:

Court Decision in Asbestos Case Punishes Victims for Bad Decisions They Didn’t Make

When Garlock went bankrupt, a federal bankruptcy judge had to decide how much money the company should put into a trust fund to pay asbestos victims who had become ill as a result of exposure to toxic asbestos fibers. Manufacturers of asbestos products pay into these trust funds to ensure…

Updated:

Health Insurers’ Claims to Asbestos Damages

In most lawsuits based on defective products or personal injury, plaintiffs file individual claims, which become public knowledge. Asbestos cases are different. Many asbestos manufacturers have gone bankrupt because so many people were harmed by exposure and manufacturers had to compensate for serious health problems like asbestosis and mesothelioma. To…

Contact Us